
From Colbert to Chaplin: Why NurScope Was Always Inevitable
Share
When Paramount fired Stephen Colbert, it wasn’t just the end of a late-night TV show. It was a political play that exposed the deeper undercurrent of American media: if you challenge the status quo with sharp, satirical truth, your mic will eventually be cut.
Colbert's dismissal was sudden, but not surprising. His show had become more than entertainment—it was a cultural checkpoint for millions, especially in an era where facts and comedy had become indistinguishable. That mix clearly made people uncomfortable, especially those with power.
The twist? As Colbert exited, the audience included not just fans but rival late-night hosts showing up in support. That kind of solidarity was rare, yet powerful. These weren’t just coworkers—they were creators who understood the stakes. The message was loud: if one of us can be silenced, we all can.
But here’s the rub: they don’t have to wait for a network to give them a mic. They are the network now.
Just like when Charlie Chaplin, Mary Pickford, Douglas Fairbanks, and D.W. Griffith said "no thanks" to the studio system and created United Artists in 1919, today’s creators have the tools, talent, and tech to build something new. Something by us, for us. Something that can’t be canceled because it was never beholden to outdated gatekeepers.
And that’s exactly why NurScope exists.
We are a creative house powered by Black and Asian Muslims. Our goal isn’t to get a seat at someone else’s table—it’s to build our own stage. Through film, fashion, and digital media, we’re creating platforms that can’t be shut down. NurScope is here to normalize creativity that centers culture, values, and community.
Stephen Colbert reminded us that even icons can be fired. But at NurScope, we remind you: when we build our own, we can never be fired. We can only rise.
Support us: Nurscope GoFundeMe